Democracy & voting rights

"Trump is openly working either to rig the elections, block them altogether or overturn the results," the WSWS wrote. It warned the ruling could feed post-election challenges and blamed Democrats for "doing nothing more than wringing their hands and filing court suits."

World Socialist Web Site Sep 29 that day's brief ›

"For the second time in six years, Trump is attempting to steal a national election," the WSWS wrote, and it aimed its criticism at the postal workers' union for challenging the rule in court instead of refusing to enforce it. It reported the union's own brief calling the counter clerks "indispensable" to implementation.

World Socialist Web Site Sep 11 that day's brief ›

"The attack on mail-in voting is part of a broader effort to disenfranchise working class and poor voters." The far left filed the disclosure inside a longer argument about the destruction of the Postal Service itself, and it is the only camp that reported the constitutional text against the order, that Article I gives the manner of federal elections to the states. Its second piece attacked the postal unions for holding rallies of a few dozen people rather than organizing a strike.

World Socialist Web Site Sep 2 that day's brief ›

also cited World Socialist Web Site

"The system as it stands is rigged in favor of candidates and policies favored by the capitalist elite" is the socialist read, and it declines to defend the existing system while opposing Trump's changes to it. CounterPunch traces today's denialism back to Russiagate, arguing Democrats "take no responsibility for attempting to delegitimize a winning presidential candidate." Its list of what actually corrupts elections is structural: the Electoral College, Senate apportionment, gerrymandering and money.

CounterPunch Jul 29 that day's brief ›

"The lurch to dictatorship is not the work of one individual." The socialist paper spends its article on the opposition rather than the order, reporting closed-door Democratic tabletop exercises war-gaming federal troops at the polls while the same leaders call the president "feeble" in public. Its charge is that the courts and the lawsuits are a substitute for mobilizing anyone.

World Socialist Web Site Jul 27 that day's brief ›

WSWS frames the killings as part of "Trump's ongoing conspiracy to establish a dictatorship" and dismisses the Democrats' letters as appeals "to the very officials responsible for the raids and killings."

World Socialist Web Site Jul 21 that day's brief ›

WSWS reads it as "a conspiracy to overturn the 2026 midterm elections and establish a presidential dictatorship," foregrounding Mullin's threat of "prison time" for noncompliant officials and faulting Democrats like Fetterman for "appealing for bipartisanship."

World Socialist Web Site Jul 20 that day's brief ›

"a pretext for suppressing, rigging or overturning the coming elections." WSWS ties the Jordan strikes to Trump's election-fraud speech as two faces of the same crisis, reporting strikes have killed at least 38 people and reached a port city's railway station, and calling attacks on civilian infrastructure war crimes under the Rome Statute.

World Socialist Web Site Jul 19 that day's brief ›

also cited World Socialist Web Site

"likely to have little impact on the November midterm elections," Truthout wrote, citing the 90-day rule. It emphasized reporting that "the system has flagged people as noncitizens who were actually citizens" in at least five states.

Truthout Sep 29 that day's brief ›

"drove a stake through the heart" of the map, Truthout wrote, calling it "undead." It ran the local clerks' ballot counts and Cleaver's "Groundhog Day" line. It framed the fight as voters' referendum power against a Republican gerrymander.

Truthout Sep 27 that day's brief ›

Truthout described the order as "delivering a fatal blow to President Donald Trump’s attempts to inject more White House control over the midterm election." It revisited the Postal Service whistleblower's warning of mass disenfranchisement. The Young Turks' video called the plan an effort to make voting harder for an unpopular party.

Truthout Sep 16 that day's brief ›

also cited YouTube: The Young Turks

Truthout called it "the gerrymandered 2025 congressional map" and walked through the week's four courts in order. It closed on the referendum group's statement that Missouri Republicans had lost.

Truthout Sep 11 that day's brief ›

"aggressively gerrymandered district lines that Republicans drew last year at the behest of President Donald Trump" is the socialist left's framing, and it is the only camp that led with the contempt filing rather than the appeal, reporting that People Not Politicians asked the state Supreme Court to hold Hoskins in contempt on Tuesday night. It printed the state party's response verbatim: "Missourians deserve better than this Republican chaos."

Truthout Sep 10 that day's brief ›

The map created "congressional boundaries many critics have said are both racial and political gerrymanders," the socialist left wrote, and it is the only camp that led with the Kansas City district's Black voters rather than the seat count. It reported that lawmakers split the city into three districts, "diluting the Black vote in the area," and that Hoskins "waited for the longest possible time permitted to him under state law" before blocking the petition.

Truthout Sep 6 that day's brief ›

The socialist left described the map as "created congressional boundaries many critics have said are both racial and political gerrymanders," and it is the only camp that stated plainly that Kansas City was split into three districts and the Black vote in the area diluted. It gave the most space to the petition drive itself and quoted the organizing group's director: "The people of Missouri demanded a voice."

Truthout Sep 5 that day's brief ›

The socialist left wrote that the changes "could result in millions of Americans never receiving their mail-in ballot," and it is the only camp that centered the resumption of work in defiance of a court order, reporting that development restarted weeks after the June injunction with no change in the legal situation.

Truthout Sep 2 that day's brief ›

"it could be a small boost for Democrats in their effort to retake control of Congress," NPR said, counting the national redistricting edge down from nine seats to eight. MSNBC stressed the existing map still favors Republicans 6-to-2 and that the Missouri GOP sought to "further increase its partisan control in the midterm elections."

NPR Sep 27 that day's brief ›

also cited MSNBC

"The tool has mistakenly flagged some eligible voters as potential noncitizens," NPR wrote high in its story, before any quote from the majority. NBC set the ruling inside a campaign, saying it came "as the president encourages states to purge people from voter rolls," and put "voter purges" in its headline. CNN and USA Today both called it a win for Trump, while the Washington Post led on the use of Social Security data.

NPR Sep 26 that day's brief ›

also cited NBC NewsCNNUSA TodayWashington Post

"The third time was not the charm," CNN opened, treating the order as the end of a Republican push for one more House seat. Seven liberal outlets put "Trump-backed" or "GOP" in the headline and closed on Cleaver's reaction. On YouTube, Brian Tyler Cohen said Missouri Republicans "went shopping for a different court instead" after losing, and cast Hoskins' contempt finding as proof the party ignores courts.

CNN Sep 26 that day's brief ›

also cited CBS NewsMSNBCNBC NewsNPRThe Guardian

The camp's sharpest receipt is not about California at all: MS NOW reported that a senior Justice Department official told supervisors on a weekly call that prosecutors could be fired if they decline FBI or DHS election-fraud referrals, and that a department spokesperson denied it, saying "He never said anyone would be fired." A former Public Integrity Section prosecutor told the network "If true, this is outrageous," and argued the greater harm falls on citizens facing unfounded accusations. Across its other five receipts and ABC's, the camp printed Newsom's charge that Trump "won't stop until he can exert dictatorial control over your free vote," the NAACP suit, and the finding that progressive turnout groups "have raised nearly 40% less than they had at this point in those cycles."

MSNBC Sep 20 that day's brief ›

also cited MSNBCMSNBCMSNBCMSNBCThe Guardian

ABC's AP copy called the case "just one example of the Republican president’s numerous attempts to assert federal control over the upcoming midterms," and moved straight to the DHS voter-roll probe. NBC framed the court as unwilling to allow last-minute rule changes, quoting an election scholar that there are no five votes "for abject chaos."

ABC News Sep 16 that day's brief ›

also cited ABC NewsNBC News

"The decision is a win for the status quo," ABC's AP copy said, filling the story with relieved election officials from both parties. USA Today called it "a major defeat for President Donald Trump," and MSNBC and NPR both noted that the administration offered no evidence of mail-voting fraud. Brian Tyler Cohen told viewers the Constitution leaves elections to states and Congress.

ABC News Sep 15 that day's brief ›

also cited USA TodayMSNBCMSNBCNPRThe Guardian

MSNBC counted "the second Supreme Court loss on the map for Republicans this week" and identified Judge Clark as a Trump appointee. CBS reported the order straight, and ABC covered the Justice Department's records letters. The Atlantic placed the week inside a longer argument that election deniers now hold local election offices.

MSNBC Sep 11 that day's brief ›

also cited CBS NewsABC NewsThe Atlantic

The mainstream left went to the voters, quoting a farmer near Sedalia who was shifted from Rep. Mark Alford's district into Cleaver's and who generally supports Republicans: "I'm not very happy with them for doing that." It is the only camp that printed a protester's line outside the state Capitol saying lawmakers "have absolutely no business redrawing the districts right now, just before an election."

ABC News Sep 10 that day's brief ›

The BBC wrote that critics warn "it could result in US citizens being wrongly removed from electoral rolls," then gave Georgia's Republican secretary of state space to describe his office's vetting. The AP account on PBS used the Travis County error rate and a naturalized Denton voter who was wrongly flagged. On PBS NewsHour, Votebeat's Jessica Huseman said voters would likely see no real effect this election because of the 90-day window.

BBC News Sep 26 that day's brief ›

also cited PBS NewsHourPBS NewsHour

The AP account on PBS said the order ended the dispute, "putting an end to a long-running legal dispute as absentee voting is underway in the midterm elections." It gave the most procedural detail of any outlet: at least 16 lawsuits, more than a million voters shifted between districts, and the Aug. 4 timing of Hoskins' petition rejection.

PBS NewsHour Sep 26 that day's brief ›

"The decision is a win for the status quo," PBS's AP copy said, repeating its earlier read and filling the story with relieved secretaries of state. BBC went to a Republican county in Georgia to report what the rule would have cost voters there. PBS analyst Amy Howe noted the order leaves the door open to a future attempt.

PBS NewsHour Sep 16 that day's brief ›

also cited PBS NewsHourPBS NewsHourPBS NewsHourPBS NewsHourBBC News

PBS called it "a stark defeat for Trump on an issue he consistently has emphasized as vital to ensuring election integrity even though there is virtually no evidence of fraud with mail ballots." It quoted secretaries of state from Washington and Colorado and noted Trump votes by mail himself.

PBS NewsHour Sep 15 that day's brief ›

PBS wrote that the order creates "an extremely rare situation that could switch the candidate choices for more than a million potential voters." The AP went to Kansas City voters and found "frustration more than confusion," quoting a retired chemist who called the switching "completely ridiculous."

PBS NewsHour Sep 11 that day's brief ›

also cited PBS NewsHourPBS NewsHourAssociated PressAssociated PressAssociated Press

"A series of conflicting court rulings has left a scar on Missouri — and left voters befuddled." The wire tier made the calendar and the ballot mechanics the story, counting down to the September 19 overseas mailing deadline and reporting that candidates certified in August are already locked to district numbers. AP and PBS both went to precedent, noting Alabama held a second primary in August after its map changed and Texas ran an open primary on Election Day in 1996.

Associated Press Sep 10 that day's brief ›

also cited PBS NewsHourPBS NewsHour

"The ruling marks a rare setback for Republicans in a nationwide redistricting battle that Trump urged Republicans to launch last year." The wire tier put the Missouri result inside the national seat count, reporting the eight-state Republican effort and the two-state Democratic answer, and it alone printed the state court's textual reasoning that a constitutional provision allowing a referendum on "any act" of the legislature covers congressional redistricting. It also noted that the president's party historically loses seats in midterms regardless of the map.

PBS NewsHour Sep 9 that day's brief ›

The wire tier made the calendar the story again, writing that the legal fight is proceeding "even as states start sending out mail ballots, leaving the administration little time to make big changes in mail ballot rules." AP and PBS both printed the government's own framing at length, including Sauer's argument that an immediate stay would "remove the improper cloud of uncertainty" over the rule, and both noted that Trump has long attacked mail voting while using it to cast his own ballot.

Associated Press Sep 8 that day's brief ›

also cited PBS NewsHour

The Examiner called the fight a "legal mess" and put the partisan stakes plainly, saying the order was "likely preventing any House pickups for the Republican Party in the state." It did not assign blame for how the mess began.

Washington Examiner Sep 26 that day's brief ›

The Examiner covered the same five bills as MS NOW but read them as positioning, noting in its third paragraph that "the governor is being eyed as a contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination" and giving the Justice Department's defense of election monitoring the last word. Its podcast supplied the camp's most useful observation, that the two parties' constituencies have flipped on documentary voting rules: Democrats now hold the college-educated voters most likely to have a passport and birth certificate filed away, while "noncollege voters are much less likely to have those things."

Washington Examiner Sep 20 that day's brief ›

also cited YouTube: The Dispatch

The Bulwark's Andrew Egger called the order "a massive rebuke of the president" and dismissed Alito's dissent: "It’s clownish stuff, but who cares?" George Conway joined Sam Stein to discuss Trump's attack on his own appointees.

The Bulwark Sep 16 that day's brief ›

also cited The Bulwark

Andrew Egger said "Trump was so far out over his skis" that no other outcome was likely, and the hosts read Kavanaugh's concurrence as a signal he could side with Trump in 2028. The Washington Examiner called the order "the latest setback in his legal efforts" but also wrote, inaccurately, that the court had decided in the administration's favor.

The Bulwark Sep 15 that day's brief ›

also cited Washington Examiner

The Dispatch's legal podcast treated the Missouri fight as a procedural tangle, walking through the dueling state and federal orders before its main segment.

YouTube: The Dispatch Sep 11 that day's brief ›

The institutional right filed Missouri as one line in a wider elections roundup, noting "Missouri's congressional map is in limbo" alongside the mail-ballot litigation and the New Hampshire primaries. It is the only camp that grouped the map fight with the rest of the administration's election-administration cases rather than treating it as a state story.

The Dispatch Sep 10 that day's brief ›

"to ensure ballots are sent only to eligible voters" is how the populist right described the rule's purpose, and it is the only camp here that stated the government's rationale in the government's terms without a counterweight in the same paragraph. The Examiner walked through the barcode and envelope requirements as tracking improvements, then noted the ruling "does not permanently strike down the USPS rule or resolve the underlying lawsuit."

Washington Examiner Sep 5 that day's brief ›

"It's increasingly clear that he wants to try to cheat his way to victory, too." The anti-Trump right treated the rule as a companion to a persuasion strategy it judges to be failing, reporting that the president's own super PAC ads feature only himself, and pairing that with the whistleblower's account of software it described as "astonishingly untested." Across three pieces it argued the batch-rejection rule is the actual mechanism, not the barcodes.

The Bulwark Sep 4 that day's brief ›

also cited The BulwarkThe Bulwark

The Volokh Conspiracy split. Ilya Somin repeated that "Trump's order is a blatant assault on federalism and separation of powers" and welcomed the result. Josh Blackman attacked the majority for reaching the merits in two sentences, writing "Except when Trump is involved."

Reason Magazine Sep 15 that day's brief ›

also cited Reason Magazine

Ilya Somin wrote that the 1st Circuit "rightly ruled the executive branch has no authority to restrict mail-in voting," applying the same major-questions reasoning used against Biden's student-loan forgiveness. Josh Blackman split with him on Missouri, calling it "extremely problematic" that about 3% of voters could suspend a map for two years and doubting the Justices read all the briefs.

Reason Magazine Sep 11 that day's brief ›

also cited Reason MagazineReason Magazine

"This isn't an especially substantial win for the Trump administration" is the libertarian read, and Reason's roundup gave the ruling four sentences and moved on, treating the standing question as the whole of what happened.

Reason.com Aug 26 that day's brief ›

"The only nightmare here is the fact that the Court let KBJ take nearly a month" is the libertarian legal blog's reaction, and this camp made the Court's internal timekeeping the story instead of the ballots. Reason's Volokh Conspiracy noted that the government filed July 27, replied Aug. 12 and got a ruling Aug. 24, and it proposed a rule letting six justices force out an opinion while a dissent lags.

Reason Aug 25 that day's brief ›

also cited Reason.com

Reason breaks from both camps, reviewing studies to conclude voter-ID laws "do not reliably benefit Republicans or hurt Democrats," undercutting Trump's fraud narrative and the left's disenfranchisement warnings alike.

Reason Jul 21 that day's brief ›

also cited Reason.com

Reason's Ilya Somin called the claims "utterly indefensible" and argued federalism is the firewall, since states run elections. Reason separately noted "that's not how it works" on Trump's threat to pull ABC and NBC broadcast licenses.

Reason.com Jul 18 that day's brief ›

also cited Reason.com

Libertarians and the anti-war right read the renewed strikes as an unconstitutional war the Congress has already voted to end. Antiwar.com foregrounds Khanna's threat to take Trump to court under the War Powers Resolution and the fact that the Senate passed the first concurrent war-powers resolution in history. The frame is constitutional and procedural: this is a war the executive is conducting without authority.

Antiwar.com Jun 29 that day's brief ›

also cited News From Antiwar.comNews From Antiwar.com

Reason covers the oral arguments procedurally, noting deep divisions: Thomas, Barrett, and Gorsuch questioning Mississippi's position. The framing is legal uncertainty ahead of the midterms, with the ruling potentially reshaping mail voting in over a dozen states. Reason identifies the constitutional question (federal Election Day statutes vs. state extensions) without editorializing on which outcome is preferable — an unusual restraint for an outlet that typically advocates strongly on voting rights issues.

Reason Mar 24 that day's brief ›

also cited Reason.com

"aims to ensure registered voters are U.S. citizens," Fox wrote of the passport plan, presenting it as an integrity measure. OAN carried DHS counsel James Percival calling the ruling "a victory for election integrity." The Federalist called two New Jersey noncitizen voting charges "another example of the thing that never happens reportedly happening yet again."

Fox News Sep 29 that day's brief ›

also cited One America News NetworkThe Federalist

Fox described a "mass voter verification system" and quoted conservative election lawyers welcoming the order as a win for election integrity. The Federalist wrote that Jackson "seemingly bragged" about the ruling's limited short-term reach, and Breitbart called the system "streamlined." All five MAGA outlets led with the government's side; none reported the Travis County errors.

Fox News Sep 26 that day's brief ›

also cited The FederalistBreitbart NewsThe Daily WireOne America News Network

The Federalist described the referendum behind the Missouri Supreme Court ruling as "pushed by left-wing activists" and quoted the 8th Circuit's argument that voters would elect different candidates than they nominated. Fox ran the order as a short flat item. Neither mentioned Hoskins' contempt finding.

The Federalist Sep 26 that day's brief ›

also cited Fox News

Fox placed the indictments inside "a broader Trump administration enforcement effort targeting alleged illegal voting and election-related crimes," and it is the only receipt in any camp on the charges themselves. It printed the Justice Department's social-media warning to "ANYONE trying to cheat," an assistant attorney general saying "America's elections are for Americans," and Mullin's 300,000 suspected cases beside the 151 arrests actually made. It closed by noting the charges are accusations and the defendants are presumed innocent, which is the detail its own framing works against.

Fox News Sep 20 that day's brief ›

The Federalist asked whether the liberal justices would "slow-walk their dissents" to run out the clock, reading Alito's dissent as a hint of it. Its news report laid out Alito's standing and ultra vires arguments at length. The Blaze ran Trump's post as its lead.

The Federalist Sep 16 that day's brief ›

also cited The FederalistThe Blaze

OAN said the administration saw the rules as "vital steps to curb potential mail ballot fraud" and put opponents' objections in scare quotes. It quoted Alito's dissent at length and no voting-rights group.

One America News Network Sep 15 that day's brief ›

The Federalist called it "a blow for Republicans" and gave the most space of any outlet to the state's argument that primary winners would face different districts.

The Federalist Sep 11 that day's brief ›

The populist right described the day as leaving the map "in legal limbo less than two months before the November general election" and gave the last word to the officials who won the second ruling, printing Kehoe's statement that "Voters and candidates deserve consistency, certainty, and not to have the rules changed between elections." It is the only camp that reported Hanaway's earlier characterization of the state court ruling as "catastrophic" while also noting she did not appeal it further.

Fox News Sep 9 that day's brief ›

The evangelical broadcaster described the executive order as Trump's "plan to add security to the mail-in voting process," a characterization no other camp used, and then printed the practical objection alongside it, quoting an association of election officers that no state currently runs elections the way the rule requires.

CBN News Aug 26 that day's brief ›

"American voters deserve to have confidence that our elections are safe and secure" is the White House statement CBN centers, treating New Jersey's registration error as vindication of the SAVE Act rather than an isolated administrative failure.

CBN News Jul 28 that day's brief ›

"Absolutely increases the risk for fraud." The evangelical broadcast covers the same files as a matter of stewardship rather than law, walking through automatic mail ballots and states without voter ID, and treating the Save America Act as the fix.

YouTube: Allie Beth Stuckey Jul 26 that day's brief ›

CBN reported the "shocking vulnerabilities" framing straight, but noted that some of the declassified documents themselves "conclude that large-scale manipulation of U.S. voting systems would be difficult to carry out without detection."

CBN News Jul 18 that day's brief ›

also cited The Christian Post

The American Conservative reported the claims but noted the voter files Trump cited "are publicly available records" and drew the parallel critics made to "the Russiagate scandal," labeling Trump's allegations "Chinagate."

The American Conservative Jul 17 that day's brief ›

The evangelical press relayed the address straight, opening on Trump's line that "if there can be no trust, there can be no greatness" and cataloging the five areas of concern without adjudicating them. CBN carried the speech live in full.

The Christian Post Jul 17 that day's brief ›

also cited YouTube: CBN News

The Advocate led with Jackson "disregarding the risk to eligible voters" and was the only outlet to ask what the system means for transgender voters whose names or documents do not match Social Security records. TheGrio, the Black outlet on the story, reported the ruling plainly and noted court filings documenting citizens flagged in error.

The Advocate Sep 26 that day's brief ›

also cited TheGrio

TheGrio led with the NAACP's Kristen Clarke and the Lawyers' Committee, framing the rule as a threat to voters who balance work, caregiving and disability. Roland Martin opened on "More losing by Donald Trump today" before the high court ruled. Al Jazeera ran the ruling straight.

TheGrio Sep 15 that day's brief ›

also cited YouTube: Roland S. MartinAl Jazeera

Roland Martin opened his show on how the Missouri Supreme Court "slapped the Secretary of State Danny Hoskins for contempt of court," and his panel tied the map fight and the mail rule to a single effort to restrict voting.

YouTube: Roland S. Martin Sep 11 that day's brief ›

"Missouri Republicans are literally out of their minds." The Black press's largest political video audience led the show with the map fight and put the focus on the constitutional officer rather than the courts, arguing that secretary of state races belong on the same ballot-scrutiny list as judges and governors. It is the only source in any camp that walked its audience through the sequence twice on air.

YouTube: Roland S. Martin Sep 10 that day's brief ›

The Arab network filed the ruling as a loss for the president, writing that "The decision is a setback for President Donald Trump and his Republican Party, which had backed the redistricting effort as part of a broader push to improve their electoral chances." It is the only outlet in this set that stated the current House arithmetic in the same piece, reporting 219 Republican seats including one right-leaning independent against 214 Democratic seats.

Al Jazeera Sep 9 that day's brief ›

"his latest attempt to squeeze as many votes as possible." The Asian American press is the only outlet in this set that reported polling on its own community's stake, citing AAPI Data's survey of 2,066 registered Asian American and Pacific Islander voters in which 53 percent agree strongly in the right to vote by mail. It also carried Asian Americans Advancing Justice's joint statement warning of "confusion, error, and mass disenfranchisement."

AsAmNews Sep 4 that day's brief ›

"a rare judicial rebuke to Trump in the national battle over redistricting." The Arab press wrote for readers outside the American system, explaining that maps are normally redrawn once a decade and that "no federal law bars partisan redistricting, known as gerrymandering." It is the only outlet that reported the crowd chanting "Let us vote!" outside the courthouse the day before the ruling and quoted a Jefferson City resident saying "Gerrymandering is the same as voter suppression."

Al Jazeera Sep 4 that day's brief ›

"This new USPS rule is a direct assault on the fundamental freedoms of millions of Americans—particularly Black voters," NAACP President Derrick Johnson told theGrio, and the Black press is the only camp that tied the postal rule to the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais ruling and the mid-cycle elimination of majority-Black districts as one sequence. It also reported the administration is preparing to deploy roughly 1,000 Justice Department election monitors, which advocates called intimidation.

theGrio Aug 29 that day's brief ›

also cited TheGrioTheGrio

"This is a major loss for President Donald Trump, who has long railed against mail-in voting," WIRED wrote on Monday night. It carried the story forward from its earlier coverage of the Postal Service portal.

WIRED Sep 16 that day's brief ›

"This is a major loss for President Donald Trump, who has long railed against mail-in voting," WIRED wrote. It is the only outlet that brought back the Postal Service whistleblower who said the portal was hastily built.

WIRED Sep 15 that day's brief ›

The technology press read the 95-page postal rule itself and reported what the rest of the coverage skipped, that "The rule compares mail-in ballots to fake bombs or cremated animal remains." It is also the only outlet that put a number on the fraud claim, noting a Heritage Foundation database going back to 1980 contains fewer than 100 proven examples of noncitizen voting.

WIRED Aug 26 that day's brief ›