Unbiasable

On the record · Updated October 1, 2026

David Sacks quotes

Trump's former AI czar

30 things David Sacks said, verbatim, from July 19, 2026 to October 1, 2026, each linked to where it ran. Grouped by the questions at issue, with who supported, disputed, or qualified each one.

8stories
30statements
Oct 1latest entry
01

The U.S. should pursue AI safety cooperation with China rather than treat AI development purely as a race to win.

Others on this question

Dario Amodei Anthropic CEO Supports
“the more long-term thing would be working together to put a speed limit on the rate of AI progress.”

David Sacks on Economy, jobs & inflation1

Posted it themselves

“Today’s economic numbers: — Q2 GDP revised up to 2.2% (was 1.5%). — Core PCE 3.0% vs 3.3% expected. — ADP private jobs +90k vs ~68k expected. Growth beat. Inflation cooled. Jobs better than expected. The Trump economy is strong.”

on new GDP, core PCE inflation and ADP jobs figures, praising Trump's economy

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

David Sacks on Climate & energy1

In their own words

“The whole water consumption thing is largely a hoax. Total hoax. Modern data centers recirculate the water.”

on data center water recirculation technology reducing environmental impact

All-In Podcast New York's data center pause ›

David Sacks on Tech & AI27

Posted it themselves

“Only President Trump could convene all the leaders of the top companies developing chips, data centers and frontier models for Super Intelligence. This new Industrial Revolution has already created a million new jobs and is spurring a bigger infrastructure build-out than the”[post continues]

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“When frontier labs talk of “aligning” models, ask: to what? If they say values, ask: whose? If it’s theirs rather than the user’s: why?”

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“Last year the same labs, politicians, NGOs, and media outlets now pushing the extinction hoax were running a full-scale campaign that AI would cause a jobs apocalypse. We were told it would be a “white-collar bloodbath,” 10–20% unemployment, half of entry-level jobs gone. Obama”[post continues]

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“Nvidia’s OpenShell announcement is a reminder that agent safety is an engineering problem. Recent breakouts weren’t proof that development must stop. They were proof that the sandbox was too weak. The runtime environment was poorly designed and misconfigured. The right response”[post continues]

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“If we’re concerned about superintelligence escaping human control, should we really be training it to refuse instructions and act as a “conscientious objector” against its creators?”

on debate over whether AI models should be trained to refuse creator instructions

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“Wouldn’t a simpler rule be: Do what the user wants, provided it’s legal. If you align the model to an 84-page constitution that can overrule both the user and its creators, don’t act shocked when it treats humans as optional.”

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“WSJ: The AI Build-Out Is Biggest in U.S. History When Democrats advocate for a Pause or Moratorium, they know that would wreck the U.S. economy. But since it’s the Trump economy, they’re fine with that.”

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“Mark Zuckerberg: “I don’t think that we need some kind of industry-wide coordination... I think that just each lab needs to take the time, and when it sees that there are issues, you just take the time that you need internally to make sure that you’re proceeding safely… “we’re”[post continues]

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“Eric Schmidt: “We’re not going to do a pause… First, it’s counter to the incentives of all the players. Second, how do you verify it?””

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“Thanks to President Trump’s leadership on AI: — a million new jobs have been created around the AI buildout; — 401(k)s are up ~12% this year as AI capex and productivity lift the market; — America is re-industrializing, including the first large private investments in power”[post continues]

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“Another Karp heater: the AI labs have repped themselves as if they do not have the sense God gave a goat, so Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are just monetizing it.”

on Sanders and Warren capitalizing on AI labs' public missteps

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“This is Trust & Safety 2.0. The last time we had media-generated panics like this (with Russiagate and Covid), social media companies created “trust & safety” teams to censor conservative and dissident voices. Those hires worked with left-wing NGOs like the SPLC to police public”[post continues]

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“Joe Lonsdale: “These companies should be held extremely liable for any damage they do. We shouldn't be putting regulators in. They're just going to get captured... The right should be against regulation, but for liability to hold companies accountable.””

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“Jensen Huang: “Safety is paramount. In a lot of ways, it’s job one. However, safety is an engineering problem... If we’re not confident about the safety of the products — like all companies, like you and I, all the companies here — if you build a product or a service and you’re”[post continues]

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“Mark Zuckerberg: “Meta delayed shipping Muse for several months to focus on safety and security. We didn't call for everyone else to do this before we would. We just did it as part of our day-to-day work because it was clearly the right thing for people and for us.””

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“Dario has written that we need to “pace the frontier,” and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead. You guys are the frontier. By any reasonable metric — market share, revenue growth, model capability — the two of you have a duopoly on frontier”[post continues]

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

““We had the gloom and doom about jobs. ‘All jobs are going away. There won't be any jobs left for humans.' All the evidence as of today is to the contrary. Every single piece of evidence. If anything, it's creating jobs. So they’re 0 for 1 on that.””

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

““I think they're having AI psychosis… I'm not sure they're dispassionate critics, observers of what's happening.””

on Sacks dismissing AI risk critics as alarmist

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

Posted it themselves

“Surely Anthropic’s IPO must be paused until the claims of this “whistleblower” can be investigated.”

on a whistleblower's claims against Anthropic ahead of its IPO

@DavidSacks @DavidSacks on X ›

In their own words

“It does not use an excessive amount of water. That's total fake news. We know the systems recirculate. And these data centers can be put in places where they're not bothering people. So, there is a good deal to be made there.”

All-In Podcast The data center backlash ›

In their own words

“Trump is going to turn out to be right about this data center issue. I have told you guys before that Trump is ultimately the best friend of innovators in Washington”

on Trump's stance toward AI data center expansion

All-In Podcast The data center backlash ›

In their own words

“Look, there's a lot of innovation going on. I think American companies are competing very well. I think we are winning the AI race, as long as we don't do something stupid to shoot ourselves in the foot.”

All-In Podcast OpenAI's new model ›

In their own words

“But now we're basically banning the data centers. We're not going to have those data centers full of geniuses.”

on chip export restrictions limiting AI data center buildout

All-In Podcast The data center restrictions ›

In their own words

“But now we're basically banning the data centers. We're not going to have those data centers full of geniuses. And he's done his best to restrict sale of chips to our allies as well.”

on chip export restrictions to allies limiting AI data center buildout

All-In Podcast The data center backlash ›

People, on the record

Know what they argued, not just what they said.

The daily brief connects each person’s exact words to the question they addressed and the people who answered. Free.

Free to start. No spin. No yelling.

$5/month, cancel anytime. Secure on Stripe, and nothing is ever paywalled.

One-time, secure on Stripe. No account.