Unbiasable

Part 4 · The biased machine

Chapter 17

Recommender systems as gatekeepers

A recommendation system now decides what billions of people read before any of them choose. Frances Haugen, who built such systems, told the Senate in 2021 that a $1 trillion company was paying for its profits with users' safety.

What is algorithmic gatekeeping?

Algorithmic gatekeeping is the automated form of the oldest power in the news: deciding what reaches the audience and what does not. Where an editor once chose the front page, a recommendation system now ranks each person's feed. On October 5, 2021, Frances Haugen, a former Facebook product manager who had worked on exactly these systems, told a U.S. Senate subcommittee that the company had become a $1 trillion business by resolving the conflict between profit and safety in its own favor. She described her own job first:

Primary source 01 / 07

My job has largely focused on algorithmic products like Google+ Search and recommendation systems like the one that powers the Facebook News Feed.

Frances Haugen former Facebook product manager and whistleblower Statement to the U.S. Senate, 2021 · Senate Commerce subcommittee, October 2021

The gatekeeper, she testified, is now the ranking system, and it reaches almost everyone:

Primary source 02 / 07

Right now, Facebook chooses what information billions of people see, shaping their perception of reality.

Frances Haugen former Facebook product manager and whistleblower Statement to the U.S. Senate, 2021 · Senate Commerce subcommittee, October 2021

That reach would matter less if the system ranked for accuracy. Haugen's account, drawn from internal research she copied before leaving, was that it ranked for engagement, and that engagement rewarded conflict:

Primary source 03 / 07

The result has been a system that amplifies division, extremism, and polarization

Frances Haugen former Facebook product manager and whistleblower Statement to the U.S. Senate, 2021 · Senate Commerce subcommittee, October 2021

Profit over safety

Haugen's central charge was not that Facebook's employees were careless. It was that a business paid by engagement faces a standing conflict of interest, and that the company kept resolving it the same way:

Primary source 04 / 07

I saw that Facebook repeatedly encountered conflicts between its own profits and our safety. Facebook consistently resolved those conflicts in favor of its own profits.

Frances Haugen former Facebook product manager and whistleblower Statement to the U.S. Senate, 2021 · Senate Commerce subcommittee, October 2021

The scale of what was being traded, she argued, was enormous:

Primary source 05 / 07

Facebook became a $1 trillion company by paying for its profits with our safety, including the safety of our children.

Frances Haugen former Facebook product manager and whistleblower Statement to the U.S. Senate, 2021 · Senate Commerce subcommittee, October 2021

She reduced the finding to a line she wanted the senators to remember:

Primary source 06 / 07

Facebook chooses profit over safety every day

Frances Haugen former Facebook product manager and whistleblower Statement to the U.S. Senate, 2021 · Senate Commerce subcommittee, October 2021

A gate no one can inspect

What makes algorithmic gatekeeping different from the newsroom kind is that the rules are private. An editor's judgment could be argued with in public. A ranking model is invisible, even to regulators, and Haugen argued that only the company can see how it works:

Primary source 07 / 07

Only Facebook knows how it personalizes your feed for you.

Frances Haugen former Facebook product manager and whistleblower Statement to the U.S. Senate, 2021 · Senate Commerce subcommittee, October 2021

This is the gatekeeper the earlier chapters were tracking. The filter bubble named the personalized feed, the attention economy explained its motive, and algorithmic gatekeeping is the power it now holds over the record. The last chapter turns to the moment the machine stops sorting the record and starts producing it. Facebook publicly disputed Haugen's account.

Frequently asked

What is algorithmic gatekeeping?

It is the automated control of what news and information reaches you, exercised by the ranking and recommendation systems that order your feed. They decide what to show and what to bury, taking over the gatekeeping role that human editors once held.

Who is Frances Haugen?

Frances Haugen is a former Facebook product manager who, in 2021, disclosed thousands of pages of internal company research to Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission. She testified before a Senate subcommittee on October 5, 2021, that the company knew its engagement-based ranking amplified harm and chose not to fix it. Facebook disputed her characterization.

How is a recommender system a gatekeeper?

A recommender system predicts what you are most likely to engage with and ranks your feed accordingly. Because you mostly see what it ranks highest, it decides which stories reach you and which effectively disappear, which is what a gatekeeper does, now run by software instead of an editor.

Did Frances Haugen say Facebook puts profit over safety?

Yes. In her testimony she said Facebook repeatedly faced conflicts between its profits and user safety and consistently resolved them in favor of profit, and that the company chooses profit over safety every day. Facebook publicly disputed her account.

The primary sources

The documents this chapter quotes. Read them yourself.

The field guide

Now watch it happen in real time.

Every mechanism in this guide runs in tomorrow’s news. The brief lays the same stories across ten worldviews so you can catch the framing yourself. Free.

Free to start. No spin. No yelling.

$5/month, cancel anytime. Secure on Stripe, and nothing is ever paywalled.

One-time, secure on Stripe. No account.